Monday, May 12, 2008

Army Command: May13/ 6:00AM Beirut/Time "crack on all violations..."

صدر عن قيادة الجيش – مديرية التوجيه البيان التالي: على أثر الأحداث التي جرت خلال الأيام الأخيرة، وبخاصة في بيروت والجبل، عززت وحدات الجيش انتشارها في مناطق التوتر، وهي تعمل على التأكد من استتباب الأمن وفرض النظام، ومنع أي ظهور مسلح أو نشاط أمني من قبل أيّ من الأفرقاء، لذا ستعمد وحدات الجيش إلى ضبط المخالفات على أنواعها، فردية كانت أو جماعية، بالوسائل المعتمدة، ووفقاً للأصول القانونية، حتى ولو أدى ذلك إلى استعمال القوة. يبدأ العمل بهذه الإجراءات اعتباراً من الثالث عشر من أيار، الساعة 6.00 صباحاً. وتدعو قيادة الجيش جميع الأفرقاء للتعاون، انسجاماً مع دور المؤسسة العسكرية الضامن لأمن الجميع

.

"... an attempt to drive a wedge into the two year-old alliance between Hizbullah and Aounist Christians..."

"..... March 14th’s latest challenge to Hizbullah appears to have been partly an attempt to drive a wedge into the two year-old alliance between Hizbullah and Aounist Christians, who resent being excluded from power, but are not especially keen on the Shia party’s weaponry or anti-Western rhetoric. That strategy has not worked. Despite the defection of many Christians this alliance has held, so giving broader sectarian cover to Hizbullah...."

Al Jazeera: "Saudi Arabia closes its Embassy & Khojah leaves Lebanon by boat at a haste"

الجزيرة: السعودية تغلق سفارتها في بيروت بعد مغادرة سفيرها الأراضي اللبنانية
الغى رئيس اللقاء الديمقراطي وليد جنبلاط يلغي مؤتمره الصحافي الذي كان مقررا بعد الظهر وذلك بعد لقائه القائمة بالاعمال الاميركية في لبنان ميشال سيسون.

Haaretz: "Prompt, serious engagement in negotiations with Syria could create an envelope around Lebanon that would reduce Hezbollah's abilities..."

Haaretz calls for "engagment" as a solution for Israel, in Haaretz, here
".......there is no choice but to acknowledge that this government does not in fact control Lebanon ......
....Prompt, serious engagement in diplomatic negotiations with Syria could create an envelope around Lebanon that would significantly reduce Hezbollah's ability to act against Israel. Granted, Syria cannot be expected to sever its ties with either Iran or Hezbollah. But when a country that is allied with Iran and gives aid to Hezbollah is not "embarrassed" to declare its desire to forge a peace and security pact with Israel, it thereby presents a genuine strategic alternative....."

"Unspoken" American-Iranian political condominium in Lebanon could prove to be key to power-sharing and stability in other parts of the region..

Amid reports that US's DCM, Michele Sison advised Siniora to "resign rather than face defeat by rescinding the 2 executive orders, ... and thus remain a CARETAKER government", ....Rami Khouri offers these thoughts in the DailyStar, here
"...If Lebanon shifts from street clashes to the hoped-for political compromise through a renewed national dialogue process, it will have a national unity government whose two factions receive arms, training, funds and political support from both the United States and Iran. Should this happen, an unspoken American-Iranian political condominium in Lebanon could prove to be key to power-sharing and stability in other parts of the region, such as Palestine, Iraq and other hot spots. This would also mark a huge defeat for the United States and its failed diplomatic approach that seeks to confront, battle and crush the Islamist-nationalists throughout the region..."

"Sacking" of Washington MidEast Hand Points Up Growing Rift Between Washington Ideology and Israeli Pragmatism

Laura Rosen, in MoJo, here
"The irony is not lost that in Israel, Malley's position that the current Israeli-Hamas stand off warrants an honest discussion of alternatives has come to be advocated by many former Israeli security and diplomatic veterans from both the right and increasingly the left. Chief among them, former Israeli intelligence chief Efraim Halevy.
"We have to reckon with Hamas as an element in the equation," Halevy told me in a recent unpublished interview. "Now whether this has to be done by direct talks with Hamas is a question of methology, mechanics --- not the principle. The principle is we have to engage them. ... At the moment, neither side wants to speak with the other. But every side wants to engage the other. ...Hamas is willing to act as an element in the equation."

Lebanon's Sunni bloc built militia ..

"The Future movement used a security firm to assemble a private force, officials say. But the fighters were no match for the Shiite group Hezbollah." In the LATimes, here
"We are prepared to fight for a few hours but not more," said one of the Sunni fighters in the waning moments of the battle. "Where do we get ammunition and weapons from? We are blocked. The roads are blocked. Even Saad Hariri has left us to face our fate alone."
The head of a conventional private security firm in Beirut, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said the Sunni force was "not really ready."
"You can't just spend millions of dollars to build an army in one year," he said. "They have to be motivated and believe in something. They have to be willing to die."

Over the last year, Secure Plus went from a small security company to an organization with 3,000 employees and unofficial associates on the payroll, mostly poor Sunnis from the country's north. Some were armed with pistols and assault rifles...."

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Israeli Officials: "Omar Suleiman visit last-ditch effort to prevent IDF strike in Gaza.."

"One of the main dilemmas we are facing is whether or not Israel should link the truce agreement to Shalit's release," a senior official said. "So far, we do not have an answer."

Lipkin-Shahak: "If an armed conflict erupts it will be simpler to strike Lebanon when Hezbollah is the legitimate ruler," ...

You don't say? Cuz' I had a feeling that them being not in control did not really keep your savagery away ... did it? In Haaretz, here
"....Former IDF chief of staff Amnon Lipkin-Shahak said Sunday Hezbollah's persistent attempts to take over Lebanon could eventually benefit Israel in its struggle against the militant group. "If an armed conflict erupts it will be simpler to strike Lebanon when Hezbollah is the legitimate ruler," Shahak told the Army Radio..."

USS Cole crosses the Suez returns towards the Coast of Lebanon ..

AFP (should we add to the post below: (2 Dates & 3 reversed roles) 2 Boats? 83' USS New Jersey, 08' USS Cole?)

Israel, A country like the ones almost all of us came from?

SicSemperTyrannis, here
".....Multiple new polls show that younger American Jews feel less of a connection to Israel than older Jews. And while there is heated debate about some of the polls' methodologies and conclusions, most Jewish leaders are very concerned about the data. The leaders see them as a long-term byproduct of intermarriage, assimilation and controversial Israeli policies, including settlement expansion in the occupied territories."
"You can't trust anyone." Let us hope that we Americans are coming to end of that kind of idea. I am not surprised that young Jewish Americans are not so gullible as to cower before the fears of their ancestors. They have looked around them and have seen that there is no need..."

Lebanon: May 17,1983' & May 7,2008'.. two dates.. 3 reversed roles...

May 17 1983' & May 7 2008', two 'infamous' dates, and 3 reversed roles: That of Michel Aoun, Walid Jumblatt and a large segment of Lebanon's Sunnis!




Siniora: "Israel never committed such crimes in Beirut..." Israel: "Siniora is fiction..."

Al Jazeera, here
وأضاف السنيورة أمام مقر الحكومة
بعد قراءته الفاتحة على أرواح ضحايا المواجهات أن "الذي يجري في بيروت لم يجرؤ العدو الإسرائيلي على القيام به".
"Lebanon has no government. It is a fiction, there is only Hezbollah," Ramon said during the weekly cabinet meeting. "Hezbollah is directly responsible for everything that happens [in Lebanon], and the organization completely controls the state."
According to [Military Intelligence Chief] Amos Yadlin, "in the beginning, Hezbollah tried to do it in democratic ways, and later via non-violent demonstrations, and they failed, and that is why they advanced to a move involving a military force."

Pyongyang Company Funneled Reactor Parts to Damascus, Intelligence Officials Say

Wright still harping about this in the WaPo, here
"...It was the company's suspicious buying habits -- and the branch office it opened in Damascus -- that inadvertently contributed to the alleged reactor's discovery and later destruction in a Sept. 6 Israeli bombing raid, U.S. officials say. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Michael Mullen declined in an interview to say whether Washington helped with the raid, but he strongly endorsed it.
"The reactor which was being built was not very far from being operational and needed to be hit," Mullen said..."

"..The Saudis haven't just corrupted American public figures -- they've built an entire Saudi cheerleading industry on the Potomac and beyond.."

In the Pittsburg Tribune Review, here, via AngryArab.
"...The Saudis aren't worried about our reaction. They know they'll always have regiments of paid protectors in Washington. They haven't just corrupted a few American public figures -- they've built an entire Saudi cheerleading industry on the banks of the Potomac and beyond.
If our think tanks and universities had to list their funding sources on the cover of every "study" they publish, you'd be stunned. The Saudis and the Persian Gulf emirates have poured money into "nonpartisan" centers, faculties and department chairs from Massachusetts Avenue to Cambridge, Mass. (If you think mortgage brokers are greedy, you've never seen an intellectual offered a grant.)
Another Saudi approach is to invite influential Americans to visit the kingdom as special guests: They literally get the royal treatment. Our political high-rollers and opinion-makers enjoy posh perks in Saudi Arabia -- including lucrative contracts, cash handouts and Rolex party favors..."

Olmert: "Assad is the president of Syria. He enjoys fairly effective control over his country, and I'm looking forward to negotiating with him"

lally Weymouth interviews Olmert in Newsweek, here
Q: Officials in the U.S. government are reportedly concerned that Syria's real price for peace is Lebanon. The U.S. is interested in the survival of the government of Lebanese Prime Minister Siniora. A: I know what our expectations are. I know what the Americans' expectations are. I'm not going to do anything which [is in contradiction] to what my understanding of [what] the fundamental interests of the United States are in this part of the world.

Intifada à Beyrouth: Le États-Unis parviendront-ils à pousser le Hezbollah à la faute ?

Thiery Meyssan, author of L’Effroyable imposture 2 (le remodelage du Proche-Orient et la guerre israélienne contre le Liban), in reseau Voltaire, here (this scenario is quite Satanic if you ask me ...)
"....Les émeutes de Beyrouth sont un trompe l’œil. Elles ont été volontairement facilitées par les États-Unis qui espéraient pousser le Hezbollah à tuer les principaux leaders du gouvernement. Car seul un carnage aurait pu justifier une intervention de l’OTAN. Cependant l’Alliance nationale a fait preuve d’une grande retenue et n’a pas attaqué le palais du gouvernement. Cherchant à relancer les affrontements, le Premier ministre de facto a dénoncé les deux seules personnalités consensuelles aptes à entreprendre une médiation et a appelé à une contre-grève générale pour créer les conditions de débordements...."
Click image to close window

Robert Malley 'sacked' by Obama "for talks with Hamas"...?

In Murdoch's London TIMES, here
"One of Barack Obama’s Middle East policy advisers disclosed yesterday that he had held meetings with the militant Palestinian group Hamas – prompting the likely Democratic nominee to sever all links with him...."

New York Times Editor: "..he'd say the US backs Hariri, who is not a nice boy thrust into a role by the murder of his father, a tool of the Saudis.."

Via AngryArab, this "accidental email" sent to Nir Rosen (with Nir's permission) here
"Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 09:58:15 -0400
From:--------------------------------
To:
nirrosen
Subject: Re: urgent from the lebanese civil war
i don't think nir knows 'what it all means'. his unvarying approach is to listen to public american policy, find a hypocritical fissure somewhere, then say that fisssure is key to the whole thiing. in Leb, he'd probably say the US backs Hariri, who is really not a nice boy thrust into a historical role by the murder of his father but a deadly schemer and double-dealer and even a semi-fundamentalist tool of the Saudis. therefore, the US is secretly responsible for the lebanese conflict but is too dumb to even know it's responsible.
did you see nir's exchange with joe biden in the senate? he was
lecturing biden about american 'imperialism' in iraq and how he (nir) didn't want to answer biden's question about what the US should do to make things better in iraq because that would constitute helping the americans 'to be better imperialists.'"
PS Nir says that "the paperback version that just came out most of those mistakes (which were my editor's not mine) were corrected anyway (including the title-green bird was taken out))
and yes, revenge was a motive for the resistance, they often cited it."

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Jumblatt: "It APPEARS that the 'landline telecom network' pertains to the security of the Resistance..."

No kidding? Couldn't you have like 'double checked' before you plunged the country in strife, and given the Opposition this swift victory?
تبين أن لشبكة الاتصالات لحزب الله لها أبعاد تمس بالمقاومة والجيش سيقرر بشأنها

Hezbollah Eases Up and Beirut Opens Its Shutters ...

"Street Notes from the Hamra District" ,... Franklin Lamb at Counterpunch, here

Click image to close window

“Saad Hariri let us down ...we don’t want the Future Movement any more, or the whole Hariri family.."

Hariri losing ground to Future hawks (oxymoron?) in the North, where Future loyalists go on a rampage ....In the New York Times, here

The Bushies and Beirut (The gang that can't shoot straight)

Col. Pat Lang, at SicSemperTyrannis:
"Is this the best we can do? What happened to the much feared covert interventions of the CIA, dreaded across the world by "liberation" movements for decades. Is this the best we can do?
Our toadies (the government of Lebanon) are "holed up" in government offices and private compounds behind the protection of an "army" that specializes in parades and refereeing Beiruti political squabbles?
The Iraqi Arabs I have been teaching lately make a specialty of mocking most Beirutis. They imitate their "cute" accent, lisp and swish away when laughing at them. They don't feel that way about the Shia militiamen (Hizbullah and Amal). I have never asked them about the Aounis. I should do that.
If I were Saad Hariri, I would "get out of Dodge." That "army" is not going to protect him if its own safety is at stake. Siniora (Sonora)? Nice is nice this time of year. He probably has a place there.
We Americans (well, the Bushies) brought this on with our insistence that Shia numbers and electoral success would not be reflected in the division of power within the government of that sad little country.
Did we encourage the Sonorans to think that they could demand the self-disembowelment of Hizbullah? Did we really think the Government of Lebanon actually could do that. We may well have. It would be of a piece with the fantasy driven policy of the last eight years. Any gamble, no matter how absurd and improbable of success has fit the pattern of desperate longing that has driven American policy this last decade.
Would McCain's policy in the region be any more grounded in real calculation of the odds? Doubtful. Would Obama's be better? I wonder. Look at his advisers." pl

"Clearly, Bush has a two-header now., to explain the lack of progress on the peace process & a crisis in Lebanon..."

Wright in the WaPo, here
"...Along with Iraq and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Lebanon has been central to the administration's Middle East agenda ..... "Clearly, Bush has a two-header now. He'll have to explain away the lack of progress on the peace process, and a crisis in Lebanon that could see the collapse of the Siniora government. It comes at a time when the news from Iraq is as gloomy as ever and oil prices have reached $126 a barrel,"

Army Command to Siniora: "RESCIND the two executive orders dealing with Gen. Shukeir & Resistance telecom. landlines"

قيادة الجيش اللبناني تطلب رسمياً من حكومة السنيورة إلغاء القرارين المتعلقين بالعميد شقير وشبكة الإتصالات المفاومة

Army Command: "Gen. Shukeir stays at post & to 'preserve the integrity of the Resistance' telecom landlines..."

صدر عن قيادة الجيش- مديرية التوجيه البيان التالي:

بعد وضع القرارين المتعلقين بجهاز أمن المطار وشبكة الاتصالات السلكية في عهدة الجيش، واعتبار أنهما لم يصدرا عن الحكومة، تعلن قيادة الجيش ما يلي:

1- إبقاء رئيس جهاز أمن المطار العميد الركن وفيق شقير في وظيفته، على أن تتخذ التدابير التقنية المناسبة بعد انتهاء التحقيقات، وذلك للحؤول دون تكرار ما حصل، حفاظاً على أمن المطار وسلامته.
2- معالجة موضوع شبكة الاتصالات من قبل سلاح الإشارة في الجيش، بما لا يضرّ بالمصلحة العامة وأمن المقاومة.
3- الطلب من جميع الأفرقاء إعادة الوضع إلى ما كان عليه قبل بدء الأحداث الأخيرة في البلاد، لجهة منع المظاهر المسلحة وسحب المسلحين وفتح الطرقات.
4- تكليف وحدات الجيش المنتشرة مواصلة اتخاذ الإجراءات الميدانية لحفظ الأمن وبسط سلطة الدولة وتوقيف المخالفين.

Friday, May 9, 2008

Saad Hariri opts for de-escalation in Northern Lebanon ..

This from an opposition leader in North Lebanon: (with permission)
"...At the eleventh hour (at 10:00PM Beirut time), and in need of a show of force to refurbish a much tarnished 'praetorian' image, Future movement leader Saad Hariri reverses an order to escalate in Northern Lebanon against the Tripolitan Alawis & Karameh loyalists... The order to escalate in the North was given earlier on Friday after deliberations with Future Northern Command and Samir Geagea', who 'guaranteed the neutralization' of Suleiman Frangieh's if the later should join the fray.
However, the balance tipped in favor of de-escalation at the behest the Future 'Beiruti Entourage', who were vehemently against such rash moves, for they felt that Beirut, fresh out of a total Future rout, was the natural theater for an Opposition reprisal! The 'Beirutis' felt that their city was at the mercy of Opposition Forces on the one hand and an "untrustworthy" Lebanese Army's Commander. Coincidentally, March 14 hawks are heretofore not mincing their words whenever talking about Army Commander Michel Suleiman..."

The End of the New Middle East

Nir Rosen at the Washington Note, here
"....If one dreams of a Hizballah without weapons, or a Hamas that does not engage in violent resistance, or any sort of peaceful resolution in the Middle East, then one has to begin at the beginning, with the Israeli occupation of Palestine..."

"Barricading Beirut..."

NEWSWEEK, here and Fida' Itani in Al Akhbar, here ,.. sort of reminded me of this VanityFair story
"...Some analysts speculate that by seizing Beirut, Hizbullah was attempting a strategy similar to that of the Palestinian group Hamas, which took power by force in the Gaza Strip last June. Yet at least so far, Hizbullah has proceeded with more caution, declaring it would hand over some captured territory to the Army as a gesture of goodwill. Nasrallah and other Hizbullah leaders are likely to want to avoid the trap Hamas fell into in Gaza. Hizbullah—which is backed by Syria and Iran—has to be careful not to be "too big in Lebanon,"
[09leba.ms.650.jpg]

WINEP: "regardless of the timing of the standoff, it appears the government miscalculated...& for Washington, there are few policy options..."

WINEP's Schenker wants to throw the Army in the fray ...here
"......Given the bleak prospects, all eyes are on the LAF, considering the pivotal role it could play on the ground. But so far, it has not intervened.....With so much at stake, now is the time for Washington to use whatever leverage it might have to encourage the LAF to fulfill its national responsibility to protect Lebanese institutions. Concerned about the potential fragmentation of the military, LAF senior leadership is typically loath to insinuate the army into this kind of affair. In this case, however, they should be pressed to make an exception ....."

"Israel never destroyed a mediatic institution nor burned a news print in Lebanon..."

So says a March14/ Lebanese Forces derelict who goes by the name of Elie Mahfouz!

White House: "We also urge Iran and Syria to stop their support of Hezbollah and its destabilizing effect on the government of Lebanon"

Sans commentaire! Here

Beirut Blogging ...

David Kurtz at TPM recommended these 2 blogs from Beirut ..here & here

Fatfat: Siniora to 'resign' tonight ..."if this solves the problem"

According to "Arab Diplomatic Source" in Beirut.... (ANB-TV) .... and Ahmad Fatfat says if his "resignation solves the impasse, it's possible..."

"Putsch Interruptus?"

Matt Yglesias, here "...Hezbollah stages what looked like the opening blows in a coup in Lebanon but then seem to have stopped short of that and "the Lebanese capital had mostly returned to calm on Friday morning" though Hezbollah and its allies still "closed down the television station and newspaper and political offices of Mr. Hariri, the leader of the largest bloc in Parliament, and handed them over to the Lebanese army." Over the past year or so I've heard various voices try to propagate revisionist accounts of Israel's short-lived effort to crush Hezbollah in Lebanon where people tried to argue that the mission was only an apparent failure, but actually succeeded in some sense. I think we can see from events like this that that's total nonsense -- Hezbollah is very much not crushed...."

Daily Star's Jamil Mroueh: " Jumblatt is out of the picture now ..What remains to be seen is if Hariri can match Nasrallah's high ground"

"It is the beginning of a serious line up that threatens a showdown. Can it be resolved at this stage? Yes. The openings are possible for resolving it, but they are openings that are extreme.

"Will Hezbollah back down for free? The answer is no. Will the government back down for free? The answer is no. But Nasrallah has left an opening that leaves the possibility of communication.

"He did not discount the government all out. He clearly indicated that the government [during the crackdown] was under the influence of Walid Jumblatt. In other words he exonerated Fouad Siniora, the prime minister, although in a humiliating way.

"My impression is that he left a minute, publically microscopic but for the knowing, an opening that needs to be capitalised on by Saad Hariri. Jumblatt is out of the picture now.

"What remains to be seen is if Hariri can match Nasrallah's high ground.

"The prime minister does not have a parliamentary base. His potential role is to facilitate between the sides what may come. We will find out what that next move is when Hariri talks.

"We are talking about the outcome of a battle when we have just seen one side of the fight. We need to see the other side to see what arsenal is on the table.

"Whether this role left open by Nasrallah can be activated depends on what Hariri does."

Photo

IRAQ: The elusive Iranian weapons

Tina Susman in the LATimes, here
".....A plan to show some alleged Iranian-supplied explosives to journalists last week in Karbala and then destroy them was canceled after the United States realized none of them was from Iran...."

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Russia send packing two US military attaches...

Itar-Tass, here

Al Qaeda's leader in Iraq arrested - Arabiya TV

"...Arabiya said Muhajir had been detained in a joint Iraqi-U.S. operation in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. The U.S. military said it had no information on the reports at this stage..."

Way Out? Hariri leaves the 'misunderstanding generating decrees' to the Army Commander...!

Saad Hariri basically looked defeated and decided for defusing tensions when he said that the governmental decisions shall be left to Army Commander Suleiman, who will probably refrain from widening the schism with the opposition & will keep Gen. Wafik Shouqayr in post... all the rest are details! Where is Waldo? (aka. Fuad Siniora) And now the rhetorical question: Why these decisions? Why Now?
Judah Grunstein said "...what jumped out at me from this AP report is that Hezbollah's private telecommunications network that triggered the confrontation is a "secure network of primitive private land lines [that] helped the guerrillas fight Israel's high-tech army in the 2006 summer war." Of course,an asymmetric communications capacity makes sense in the age of tracable satellite links, especially for an insurgent force playing on its "home field." But for some reason, it got me thinking about carrier pigeons."

End Game in Beirut? ALL played out in Beirut?

Col. Lang says:" It should be apparent by now that Dick Cheney is touring the Middle East lately for some purpose.

Click to see full size image

In Jerusalem the Olmert government seeks an opening to settle its problem with Syria. Bashar Assad seems to want the same thing. Cheney is said to have arrived in Israel with the message that the Bush Administration rejects the conclusions of last year's NIE on Iran in favor of some mysterious and super secret "evidence" that the Israelis supposedly have that contradicts the NIE. Olmert's government is now threatened with removal. What a coincidence!

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the forces of information management are doing all they can to beat the drums for further war in the Middle Eastern region.

Now we have the Siniora government (the Sonora government in the Bush pronunciation) in Beirut seeking a confrontation with Hizbullah? We have come to the end of the "fiddling around" in the Lebanon? Have the Jacobins, their Israelis allies and whatever it is that Cheney is, decided to end the suspense and trigger a war on Hizbullah and maybe Syria. We live in interesting times. pl

Fmr. NSC aide on "Dual Containment & Iran Obliteration..."

Laura Rosen in MoJo, here
Clinton, "....pandering to a broad American constituency that wants to hear tough rhetoric about Iran....
.....also intended to appeal to a constituency that needs constant reassurance that America's relationship with Israel is secure.....
......the word "obliterate" was both excessive and ill-advised, it might be seen as a challenge to Obama to match her toughness.....
......Iran had taken a serious decision to try to open channels to the United States, and when Bill Clinton was elected, they put out new feelers (in which I had a small role). These were ignored in favor of dual containment. Iran tried again with unilateral economic offers in 1995, but the Clinton administration responded by enacting far-reaching economic sanctions against Iran....."

Siniora looks to declare "Martial Law"....as Nasrallah says that "Resistance" & its weaponry will be defended ..

So says Minister Ogassapian, though he named it "State of Emergency" ... potato, tomato...

Bush extends Syria sanctions...

AP, via YNETnews, here "US president announces decision to continue for one year freeze on Syrian assets, ban on export of certain goods to Damascus, following Washington's charge that country had been building nuclear reactor with North Korea's help..."

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Remembering the Palestinian Nakba..

In the San Diego UT, here

Bush will not attend joint Abbas-Olmert session ... but will see Siniora on May 18 at Sharm El Sheikh

AP, via Haaretz, here
"... Even Bush's once-unfailingly optimistic language on the peace process has become more tempered of late. And the lack of a three-way meeting between him, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas - after on-again, off-again talk that one might be in the offing for this trip - seemed an ominous sign..."

Lebanon protests set to continue ...

Al Jazeera/English, here

عناصر من الجيش يخرجون مقاتلاً من تيار المستقبل في رأس النبع  (بلال جاويش)

"Future Movement" militiaman 'escorted' by Security operatives in Ras el Nabeh, Beirut.

At 60, Israel's future remains in doubt...

McClatchy's, here

Update to "Syriana" .. regurgitates the "No Deal with Syria" line ...

Oddly, the commentators on the Feltman-Mustapha Meeting" just started coming out of the wood works, when no previous mention of the 'meeting' is located anywhere. Laura Rosen, at MoJo, got this 'update' from someone who regurgitates the "no more deals with Syria ... Lebanese sovereignty is a US priority":
" A Washington Middle East hand who did not want his name used writes:
... The Feltman-Mustapha discussion had nothing to do with a potential deal and everything to do with the US government communicating to the Syrian one the elements it has about the alleged Syrian nuclear reactor. [...] Any opening to or quid pro quo with Syria for the current administration will be conditioned on tangible positive steps on Lebanon. I suspect that the next administration, even a Democratic one, will have essentially the same policy, but with arguably a lower priority.
The substance of the US position toward talks is simple: you want to do it, do it. But we are not sitting at the table unless we have something tangible on Lebanon. We are not risking our multilateral policy, consensus with Europeans and Arabs, credibility, alliances, geopolitical interests to test the improbable proposition that talking to Syria will lure it from Iran, which is Israel’s primary goal.
What is important to understand is that in the 1990s, Syria would go through the US to get to Israel and Israel would go through the US to get to Syria.
Today, roles have changed. Syria hopes to bring the US to the table by calling for a resumption of talks. Israel is worried that its options for dealing with Iran are shrinking. The last card is talking to the Syrians. Also the problems on the Palestinian track make the Syrian one more appealing in tactical terms.
This whole peace negotiations business is a smoke-screen for much different calculations on the Syrian and Israeli sides..."

Iraq has all but given up on bringing U.S., Iran together

Leila Fadel in McClatchy's here

Beirut .... sort of, today ...

A Foreign Reporter sent this today: (11.04AM/EDT)
"....i spent the entire day running around all the flashpoints in beirut, wherever there were mobs, shootings, explosions, i got harassed by various militias from both sides, but i was really shocked at the behavior of amal. i've spent a lot of time with mustaqbal militiamen, who of course are thuggish and racist and their militias are getting better organized, and thats all frightening, but they seem very weak and almost cowardly when compared with the amal thugs i saw today, who were very provocative. it had nothing to do with the labor union strike for them, it was just a show of force to specifically intimidate sunnis.
even in iraq i havent seen this kind of anti sunni sectarianism, its couched in anti baathi or anti wahabi language. obviously i've seen anti shiite sectarianism all over the place among sunnis in the region
they had switch blades, clubs, and they even had small molotov cocktail bottles in their pockets in case they needed them. they threw stones at the army without provocation, and the army was basically letting them do whatever they wanted, and proved how weak it was, the army guys were begging the amal and hizballah guys to behave basically. it was clear today how pathetically weak the lebanese army and police are. in most cases they just stood by and watched as protesters did whatever they wanted, in other cases, depending on their affiliation, they actually physically helped both sunni and shiite militias.
when the amal guys threw stones at the soldiers, all some of the soldiers did was throw them back
when the call to prayer started from the sunni mosque across the street in tariq al jadida, the amal guys started shouting various religious shiite slogans, insulting sunnis etc.
it was quite obvious that the hizballah men present were controlling them when they looked like they were about to cross to the sunni side. it was as if hizballah has these amal pitbulls who are just foaming at the mouth eager to attack and kill, and hizballah is letting them bark and bite a little, to show the other side that its holding the leash and can let go at any time and the amal pitbulls would destroy anything in their way, which it was very clear they wanted to do
this country is so fucked, the sunni militias now run checkpoints and demand IDs and act just like shiite militias"

Click to see full size image

Most Jaish Al Mahdi have entered the fray,...opposed to the US presence in Iraq, willing to take weapons from anybody who will help them fight the US.

Dr. IRak comments on an LATImes piece
".....This is important stuff. If the U.S. military was only fighting isolated special groups, the risks of things spiralling out of control and the Sadr truce completely breaking down would be less. But the way things stand now, regular JAM is very much engaged. They feel under siege and are fighting back with everything they have--and taking help from whoever is willing to provide it, including the Iranians. Given the importance of the August 2007 Sadr ceasefire to security progress during the surge period, this is a very dangerous moment in Iraq."

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

"Lame Duck Presidency"..

In the WaPo, here

After overestimating the Iraq threat, U.S. intelligence agencies are now dangerously underestimating Syria and Iran

How's that? Simple: TWICE the US has fallen for the Cheney-team spin machine ...
In the LATimes, here

Doubting the "thin" Evidence Against Iran ...

In TIME, here
"...Indeed, the U.S. allegations appear to be based on speculation, spurred by the appearance about a year ago of a new breed of roadside bomb in Iraq. Explosively formed penetrators, or EFPs, proved effective at piercing American armor by firing a concave copper disc from a makeshift cannon, which transformed the slug midair into a molten jet of super-heated metal. Accusations that Iran was shipping the things into Iraq grew louder as U.S. casualties from the weapon rose. But no concrete evidence has emerged in public that Iran was behind the weapons. U.S. officials have revealed no captured shipments of such devices and offered no other proof..."

Israel's 'Long Island' scandal link: The businesman who might topple Olmert!

In the NYPost here, via War&Piece.
"....Millionaire financier Morris Talansky - who runs an investment firm out of his tony home in Woodmere - allegedly passed money to Olmert while the politician was mayor of Jerusalem in the '90s, sources said.
In a highly unusual move, Israeli authorities have barred the country's media from publishing Talansky's name - revealed now in The Post - saying it could hamper their investigation. Israeli media has referred only to the involvement of an "American businessman."
Talansky is apparently set to sing to Israeli authorities about his alleged role in the scheme, sources said...."

Who Stopped the Talks?

"....However, the picture may be more complicated. Readers will recall that, in Basra, Iran intervened to de-escalate the conflict (not because they're nice, but because they sought to avoid an all-out intra-Shia civil war in the south). When violence spilled over into Baghdad, however, the Iranians seemed content to keep backing Shia militants in an attempt to bloody American noses.

But Dr. iRack has heard credible RUMINT that Iran also offered to initiate talks to help end the fighting in Sadr City in the context of wider discussions on the full range of U.S.-Iranian disputes--that is, the kind of sweeping diplomatic engagement many Iran analysts now recommend--but the United States rejected the overture. Scattered news reports seem to corroborate this RUMINT. According to a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor ..."

Monday, May 5, 2008

Rice, fearing "the world doesn't believe us"... requests an 'MOU' mainly on the issue of borders...

"......However, both the Israeli and Palestinian officials with whom she met expressed reservations about the idea. "The work of drafting such a document will merely halt the progress and the momentum," argued one Israeli official........
According to these sources, Israel initially expressed a willingness to cede 90 percent of the West Bank to the Palestinians, while the PA demanded at least 98 percent. In particular, Israel wants to retain the major settlement blocs and the Jordan Valley, but the PA rejects these demands......
Israeli officials who met with Rice said their impression is that she is determined to produce an achievement at almost any price, given the political capital that both she and Bush have invested in the Palestinian issue over the last year......."

Adm. Mullen: "... now is not the time for a conflict with the Islamic Republic of Iran..."

"I actually am very hopeful that we don't get into a position where we have to get into a conflict," Mullen said.........In perhaps his most explicit comments to date on tensions with Iran.....
His comments are significant in that while tensions with Iran are high, they appear to reflect his deep concern that the U.S. military is already way over-stretched by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They may also reflect a judgment that in addition to the international opprobrium a U.S. strike on Iran would ignite, Tehran could could make things even worse for the 150,000 U.S. troops in Iraq by stepping up alleged support for Shiite Muslim militias there, and for the 30,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan through increased arms supplies that have allegedly been sent to the Taliban......."

The Syrian Affair

In Counterpunch, here
"....According to Silverstein, the neo-cons want Olmert to fail, Netanyahu to take over, followed by war with Syria. “The neo-cons would rather have a war that bled an ally than a peace that rewarded their foes..."

Former Iraq Commander: Bernard Kerik was 'a waste of time' in Iraq

"....Sanchez said Kerik focused more on "conducting raids and liberating prostitutes" than training the Iraqis. ....
"They'd get tips and they'd go and actually raid a whorehouse," Sanchez told The News. "Their focus becomes trying to do tactical police operations in the city of Baghdad, when in fact there is a much greater mission that they should be doing, which is training the police."

In Lebanon, Hezbollah arms stockpile bigger, deadlier

".....The Western security officials say Turkey tries to fight the weapons activity. Turkish officials declined to comment, and the latest annual report by Turkey's anti-smuggling directorate does not describe Iranian arms smuggling as a significant problem. When Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak told Turkish journalists that Ankara could do more to crack down on arms traffic to Hezbollah, Tehran called the allegations "false and fictitious."

IRAN: Hakim's son on Tehran, Baghdad, Washington tangle

LAT: Does SIIC think that these accusations against Iran are merited?

HAKIM: Look, as I said before, the government of Iraq is responsible for maintaining security. The government is authorized to give its opinion or assessment about these allegations. In fact, you should ask the official spokesman of the Iraqi government. Yes, some officials have said about Iran's involvement, but the prime minister's office has not confirmed them. So only what prime minister or the chief of army in Iraq says are valid.Other officials may express their own personal views.

LAT: Does SIIC worry about the close ties between Iran and the Mahdi Army led by Moqtada Sadr?

HAKIM: Look, if you mean Moqtada Sadr, it is one thing. The Mahdi Army is different. The Mahdi Army is a military faction, but Moqtada Sadr has a political faction and without a doubt the Islamic Republic of Iran has good relations with Moqtada Sadr and his political faction. And we are not worried about that relationship of the political faction of Mr. Sadr with Iran. The government of Iraq should comment on that if there is a worry about that or not. So far the government of Maliki has not said so.

U.S. Plays Follow the Leader in the Middle East ...

Judah Grunstein in the WPR, here
".......To me, this underscores the way in which sometimes being right is overrated. The American position on Iran's and Syria's destabilizing regional influence, while fundamentally correct, doesn't advance our interests, or those of our partners. That leaves us little choice but to then piggy back on our partners' initiatives, which are subsequently undermined by our refusal to truly buy into them.
Good cop/bad cop only works if the perp, a) is really afraid of the bad cop; and b) really believes that cooperating with the good cop will offer some protection. Right now neither of those conditions hold true, which is why we're in for some rough sledding in terms of our broader regional policy.
Another way to look at it is that for the past seven years (and in some cases beyond), we've put broad regional pre-conditions on individual negotiations, while at the same time not rewarding individual successes (ie. Iran's participation in stabilizing Afghanistan) with broader regional concessions. Carrots and sticks works both ways."

Le scénario de Joumblatt, un prélude à l’internationalisation, selon l’opposition

Scarlett Hadad, in L'Orient-Le-Jour, here
"......Les sources proches de l’opposition considèrent toutefois que le coup de grâce à son initiative est venu de celui qui affirmait l’appuyer, Walid Joumblatt. Les mêmes sources estiment que l’attitude de Joumblatt n’est pas une réaction à une soi-disant fin de non-recevoir que la Syrie aurait adressé à la médiation du président irakien Jalal Talabani en vue de renouer le dialogue entre Assad et le chef du PSP. Elle s’inscrirait plutôt dans un plan soigneusement établi et visant à aboutir à une internationalisation plus musclée de la crise libanaise.....
.......tous ces développements sont également liés à la prochaine visite du président américain George Bush dans la région le 15 mai et ses dernières tentatives de briser la chaîne constituée par l’Iran, la Syrie, le Hezbollah et le Hamas, avant l’expiration de son mandat en novembre prochain....."

Hezbollah Trains Iraqis in Iran, Officials Say

Michael Gordon has been Judith-Millerized since "U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS" ....
In the NYTimes, here ....... Abou Muqawama says : "Gordon "is in essence repeating a narrative that was given to him." In other words, none of this is "independent".....expecting MNF-I to provide a briefing describing Iranian lethal assisance to elements of JAM (frequently described as "special groups"). The briefing has not yet occurred, but the contours of the U.S. case are now clear and they are detailed in a new NYT article by Michael Gordon
"....The training, the Americans say, is carried out at several camps near Tehran that are overseen by the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Command, and the instruction is carried out by militants from Hezbollah, which has long been supported by the Quds Force. American officials say the Hezbollah militants perform several important roles for the Iranians...."

Sunday, May 4, 2008

Maliki distances himself from U.S. accusations towards Iran Sunday saying it would not be forced into conflict with its Shiite neighbor

Fadel & Bengali in McClatchy's, here
"We don't want to be pushed into any conflict with any neighboring countries, especially Iran. What happened before is enough. We paid a lot," Dabbagh said, referring to the eight years war between the two nations in which an estimated 1 million people died...."

Tough Love for Israel

Henry Siegman in The Nation, here
"We now have word that Tony Blair, envoy of the Middle East Quartet (the UN, the EU, Russia and the United States), and German Chancellor Angela Merkel intend to organize yet another peace conference, this time in Berlin in June. It is hard to believe that after the long string of failed peace initiatives, stretching back at least to the Madrid conference of 1991, diplomats are recycling these failures without seemingly having a clue as to why the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is even more hopeless today than before these peace exercises first got under way.
The scandal of the international community's impotence in resolving one of history's longest bloodlettings is that it knows what the problem is but does not have the courage to speak the truth, much less deal with it. The peace conference in Germany will suffer from the same gutlessness that has marked all previous efforts. It will deal with everything except the problem primarily responsible for the impasse. That problem is that for all the sins attributable to the Palestinians--and they are legion, including inept and corrupt leadership, failed institution-building and the murderous violence of rejectionist groups--there is no prospect for a viable, sovereign Palestinian state, primarily because Israel's various governments, from 1967 until today, have never had the intention of allowing such a state to come into being.
It would be one thing if Israeli governments had insisted on delaying a Palestinian state until certain security concerns had been dealt with. But no government serious about a two-state solution to the conflict would have pursued, without letup, the theft and fragmentation of Palestinian lands, which even a child understands makes Palestinian statehood impossible."

Omar Suleiman's visit 'delayed', over Israeli frustration with arms smuggling into Gaza...

In YNEtnews, here
".......But State officials in Jerusalem confirmed on Sunday evening that the triumvirate of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Affairs Minister Tzipi Livni are united in their lack of enthusiasm towards a visit by Suleiman prior to Independence...."

Olmert probe clear-cut; decision soon on indictment

In HAARETZ, here

Israel is playing "curve ball" with the US and what is left of the Cheney neocon apparatus in and around the White House is soaking it up

Col. Lang, I totally agree with your remarks. And I would add a reminder that Tony Blair's intelligence mandarins were fully complicit in the pre-Iraq war intelligence fraud. Remember it was the British White Paper that spoke of the Iraqi quest for uranium yellow cake from Niger, which US intelligence checked out and knew to be phony. Israel is playing "curve ball" with the U.S. and what is left of the Cheney neocon apparatus in and around the White House is soaking it up, and trying to do a replay against Iran of what they did with Iraq. But I am reminded of the old saying: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I was reminded of that ditty watching the Petraeus and Crocker testimony last month, and now we see the same follow-on garbage again. Thank you for puncturing a hole in the vat of kool aid.harper

"Put up or shut up": Israeli intelligence & Iran

SicSemperTyrannis, here "...What could the Israelis possibly have? Something grand from their little photography satellites? Something spooky from HUMINT in Iran? How could we possibly verify anything from their HUMINT ops in Iran? Do they have something from the world banking or technical communities? OK. Let's see it...."

United States is drawing up plans to strike on Iranian insurgency camp

In the (MURDOCH's) SundayTimes, here
Despite a belligerent stance by Vice-President Dick Cheney, the administration has put plans for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities on the back burner since Robert Gates replaced Donald Rumsfeld as defence secretary in 2006... is drawing up plans for a “surgical strike” against an insurgent training camp inside Iran if Republican Guards continue with attempts to destabilise Iraq.....
British officials believe the US military tends to overestimate the effect of the Iranian involvement in Iraq.....
According to the intelligence sources there will not be an attack on Iran’s nuclear capacity. “The Pentagon is not keen on that at all. If an attack happens it will be on a training camp to send a clear message to Iran not to interfere.”

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Feltman talks to Mustapha ...

The Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for the Near Eastern Affairs Jeff Feltman & Syria's Ambassador Imad Mustapha met for just over 2 hours in Foggy Bottom ....
Amb. Mustapha was not available for 'comments' as he left on a flight to Damascus hours after the meeting. The meeting in itself is important for the simple fact that it took place (such meetings were extremely scarce if not nonexistent ...) , was unusually long for a simple "you-are-this-and-we-are-that" session, and it happened against a background of promising and/or imminently precarious regional atmospherics ...

A warning not to trust the online encyclopedia on the Israeli-Palestinian Narrative War...

"The hawkish pro-Israel group CAMERA's campaign to warp Wikipedia articles was ineffectual. But it's a warning not to trust the online encyclopedia -- and to be wary of partisan "accuracy" advocates in the Israeli-Palestinian Narrative War."

Israel Blocks Arrival Of U.S.-Funded Gear destined to Abbas's "men"...

In the WaPo, here
"....The shortage in U.S.-funded supplies threatens the Palestinian government's ability to provide security in the West Bank, which Israel has made a condition of future withdrawals from the occupied territories. There have also been significant problems with the training, including a final round that one American involved in the program described as "a complete fiasco."

Lang: "A Tale of Two Incompetents..."

SicSemperTyrannis, here

Friday, May 2, 2008

Jumblatt: "Hizbullah is working to target a plane carrying senior officials at Beirut's international airport..."

In al sharq al awsat, here

Turki Al Faisal: "The US threatened King Faisal with force after oil embargo"

In Al Sharq Al Awsat, here
Note, that the 'carrier' of the letter/threat is alive & well in Beirut!

U.S. Drops Opposition to Israel-Syria Talks ..?

Via War&Piece, in the FORWARD, here sort of reminds you of the "Yellow Light" (Abdallah Bouhabib's book) on the US's tacit acceptance of a prominent Syrian role in Lebanon ...
“The U.S. policy has gone from red light to yellow light, but it is certainly not giving a green light yet,” said Scott Lasensky, acting vice president and senior research associate of the United States Institute of Peace’s Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention....
Geoffrey Aronson, who was among the negotiators in informal back-channel talks last year between Israel and Syria, said both sides are now aware of the ticking of the political clock in Washington. According to Aronson, who directs the Foundation for Middle East Peace, the fact that the Bush administration is in its final months makes reaching a full agreement nearly impossible at this stage.
“Even if tomorrow Assad and Olmert come to the administration with a declaration of principles,” Aronson said, “it would be very difficult for this administration to take any real leadership on this issue before November.”

Olmert tenure jeopardized in corruption probe?

Via War&Piece, in Haaretz, here
"..... a senior legal source was quoted on Channel 1 as saying, "Olmert is in a grave situation, it is doubtful whether he will be able to continue to hold his position."

Gen: Ricardo Sanchez: Bush administration committed "gross incompetence and dereliction of duty" in Iraq

In Nukes & Spooks, here
"In an excerpt published in the latest edition of Time, Sanchez recounts what he contends was an attempt by Rumsfeld to involve him in rewriting the history of the invasion of Iraq by shifting to the ground commanders the blame for the failure to deploy a sufficient number of occupation troops.
Sanchez writes that Rumsfeld insisted that he was never told about an order issued by former Gen. Tommy Franks, then head of CENTCOM, for a drawdown of U.S. troops that countermanded the original plan for a 12-18 month occupation. The order directed that all but 30,000 U.S. troops should be out of Iraq by September 2003, only five months after the fall of Baghdad. Sanchez rejects Rumsfeld's version of what happened, which is indeed hard to believe given Rumsfeld's notorious micro-managing of the invasion...."

Letter From Iran

Robert Dreyfuss in the Nation, here

LEBANON: Sunni Islamism growth spurs radicalisation

OXFORD ANALYTICA: Wednesday, April 30 2008

EVENT: Saad al-Hariri, leader of the Future Movement and of the ruling March 14 coalition, is holding talks with opposition leaders before the next scheduled parliamentary session on May 13.
SIGNIFICANCE: Hariri's Future Movement has become the umbrella for all anti-Syrian secular Sunnis and is now the only Sunni secular movement of any significance amid a recent rise in Sunni Islamism in Lebanon. Since last year's battle with Fatah al-Islam, the traditional Sunni leadership is making a more concerted effort to manage Lebanon's various Sunni fundamentalist groups, some of which may have links to al-Qaida.
ANALYSIS: Sunnis today are estimated to form 32% of the Lebanese population. They live mostly in the coastal cities of Sidon, Tripoli and Beirut, in addition to settlements in Akkar and the Bekaa Valley. The Salafist groups mainly cluster around Tripoli and Akkar district in the north, whereas Sidon and Beirut are Hariri strongholds. The traditional Sunni political families - Salam, Karami and others -- have mostly been unconnected to actual political movements. Some were part of various Nasserist movements in the past, but those do not have much currency any more.

No larger graphic available.

Islamist upsurge. Since the death of former Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri in 2005, various Sunni Islamist groups have emerged as political forces in Lebanon. Previously marginalised, they now benefit from Saad al-Hariri's attempt to create a united Sunni front in the political stand-off with the Shia opposition led by Hizbollah (see LEBANON: Army being dragged into political crisis - February 15, 2008). These groups represent various strains:
  • Mainstream political movements such as Al-Jama'a al-Islamiya, Al-Ahbash, the Islamic Action Front and Hizb al-Tahrir participate in party politics and have relatively large constituencies in and around Tripoli, Beirut and Sidon (see INTERNATIONAL: Hizb ut-Tahrir channels disaffection - January 8, 2008). Jama'a, split into pro-and anti-Syrian branches, is the largest religious political group, but has lost many supporters to (the formally non-political) Salafist movements since 2005. Ahbash supports Syria staunchly.
  • Salafist organisations focus on the promotion of strict Sunni Islam through social, educational and charity work. Their leaders are influential local preachers, most of whom stay clear of politics, although some tacitly endorse the formation of underground Sunni militias.
  • A small number of militant Salafist-jihadist groups are inspired by al-Qaida, including Fatah al-Islam, Jund al-Sham, and Usbat al-Ansar. The militant strain has been strengthened by a considerable number of Lebanese Sunnis returning from the insurgency in Iraq since 2003 (see LEBANON: Palestinian Islamism adds to insecurity - June 5, 2007).
While very different, these groups all promote Sunni Islam as the only framework for social and political change and hence represent a growing political force in Lebanon. As a result of the Syrian departure in 2005, they now participate much more freely in public life.
Sectarian solidarity. Hariri's death deepened a sense of sectarian solidarity among Lebanon's Sunni community. In a break with their history, they started to act more like a minority sect whose existence was threatened. The new Sunni sectarianism strengthened political groups that mobilise along religious lines, forcing the Sunni traditional leaderships of influential families and mainstream religious scholars to seek support from Islamists and even Salafist groups in order to retain control of their constituencies.
Leaving aside the relatively weak Sunni-controlled Murabitun militia in the Lebanese civil war, the Sunnis have always been a rarity in the country: a sect without a militia. Rafik al-Hariri cultivated this image, and distanced his secular and business-oriented Future Movement from Islamist groups such as Jama'a, and particularly from radical groups.
This approach suited the Syrian regime, which feared cooperation between Lebanese groups and Syria's illicit Islamist opposition. At the same time, the Syrians promoted some mainstream groups such as Ahbash which they felt they could control, and allowed radical groups to operate in contained 'security islands' such as the Ain al-Hilweh Palestinian camp. However, any challenge to the Lebanese state was met with force.
Co-opting Sunni extremists. The departure of Syrian troops in April 2005 gave Islamists freedom to participate in politics for the first time in decades and to renegotiate their relationship with the traditional Sunni elite. As a result, Saad al-Hariri from the beginning of his tenure as leader of the Sunni community had difficulty continuing his father's line. In the 2005 parliamentary elections, Hariri spent heavily to shore up Sunni support in the contested north Lebanon district. As Jama'a boycotted the elections, some of that money ended up with Salafist preachers.
Hariri's effective funding of Salafist networks was enhanced following the 2006 Hizbollah-Israel war, when a strain of Jama'a changed allegiance to the Hizbollah-led opposition, forcing Hariri to rely even more on Salafists. Since 2005, Hariri's policies have benefited Sunni extremists in several ways:
  • In July 2005, various Sunni militants were pardoned and released. They probably drifted back into militant networks.
  • In 2006, the extremist group Jund al-Sham was reported to have been paid thousands of dollars to leave Sidon. Several of these militants joined Fatah al-Islam.
  • More generally, Hariri and Prime Minister Fouad Siniora allowed militant Salafists to organise as long as they did not carry out attacks in Lebanon. This continuation of the Syrian policy saves the army the effort of confronting armed groups.
This is augmented by a lack of clear ideological direction in the Future Movement's leadership, which often forces it to resort to sectarian rhetoric in order to mobilise its social base. To this end, Islamist groups with broad popular appeal can be useful tools in shoring up street-level support, inadvertently strengthening the Salafist trend in the population.
Nahr al-Bared fall-out. Last year's protracted battle between the Lebanese army and the al-Qaida-inspired Sunni group Fatah al-Islam brought Hariri's dealings with hard-line Sunni groups to greater Lebanese and international attention, highlighting key concerns:
  • Hariri, the Future Movement and its associated media had been using sectarian language to mobilise their supporters, fuelling the radicalisation of the Sunni 'street'.
  • Unlike most Arab countries, Lebanon had not imposed special procedures for the transfer of funds, transforming it into a hub for terrorist funding and coordination.
Nahr al-Bared was a wake-up call to the Lebanese government and the March 14 coalition, whose Christian elements have been alarmed by occasional anti-Christian rhetoric from Salafist groups. This year, buoyed by the army's victory over Fatah al-Islam, state officials and security services have become increasingly involved in de-radicalisation efforts, as have the mainstream Sunni institutions in Lebanon:
  • Dar al-Ifta, the Sunni religious establishment in Lebanon, is planning to create a Directorate for Religious Education, tasked with supervising Islamic schools and colleges, and an advisory board consisting of all Islamic parties and groups in the north, designed to help monitor Islamic groups in the north and prevent further radicalisation.
  • In recent months, representatives of the Lebanese internal security forces have met a delegation of Sunni preachers and religious scholars from Salafist organisations and institutes in the north in order to curb both radicalisation and moral and financial support for militant groups.
CONCLUSION: The current campaign to stem Sunni radicalisation may be too little too late. Lebanon is paying the price for years of Syrian policies of divide and rule, which allowed radical networks to organise, while repressing more mainstream organisations. The chaotic period after Syria's departure, along with Hariri's desperate need for Sunni support, has given radical groups scope to exploit the growing popular appeal of fundamentalist Sunni Islam in the region, which in Lebanon is exacerbated by Sunni-Shia tensions surrounding the political deadlock.