Tuesday, August 25, 2009

"Madrid +"


The Cable, here

" .... "What George Mitchell is trying to do is lay the foundation that will lead to the resumption of meaningful negotiations," State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said at a Monday press conference. "There have been some reports that we're close to a breakthrough," he said. "But any reports that we've come to an agreement, or that we expect one on Wednesday necessarily, I would have to call premature.".....

According to Cohen (former consultant to the National Intelligence Council), Mitchell expects Netanyahu to agree to some sort of settlement freeze that would be accompanied by a near-simultaneous Palestinian declaration that they would join talks before all settlements are ended; as well as signals from some Gulf and Arab states that they are willing to take intermediate steps toward normalization with Israel. Initially, that could mean the mutual opening of interests sections or liaison offices between Israel and several North African and Gulf states, Cohen said.

Aaron David Miller, said Sunday that the Obama administration is planning to produce, "in late September or October," either a conference or an announcement of a plan for a peace process -- Madrid Plus, as he called it -- involving at least three components:

  1. A relaunch of Israel-Syrian and Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, as well as a track for resuming formal multilateral relations between Israel and other Arab states
  2. An agreement with the Netanyahu government on a settlement freeze that goes further than any other Israeli government has ever gone, and one that would "grandfather in a large number of discreet units and quiet understandings on Jerusalem"
  3. The resumption by Arab states -- with or without the Saudis, but including the Bahrainis, other Gulf states, Tunisians, and Moroccans -- of liaison offices or interest sections with Israel.

"And they are going to wrap the whole thing in an event -- a conference or an announcement," Miller, now with the Woodrow Wilson Center, said........ both Russia and France are keen to host such a conference.

... Miller is effusive about the scope and significance of the prospective settlement freeze agreement the Obama and Netanyahu governments may be poised to strike, which he described as unprecedented.

(Netanyahu's proposed formula to Mitchell on settlements is that Israel won't build new Jewish settlements, won't expropriate land, and won't expand existing settlements, but will continue with existing projects already underway, the Israeli prime minister told a small gathering in London Monday. Jerusalem is not a settlement, he further said.)

But Miller remains pessimistic about the outcome of prospective negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians. "Can they reach a conflict-ending agreement right now? That's a bridge too far," Miller said, citing the gaps between Israeli and Palestinian positions on the issues of borders, Jerusalem, security, and the right of Palestinian refugees to return to ancestral homes in Israel. He also said negotiations will be hampered by the lack of a really representative Palestinian government.

"That is the point," agreed Cohen, the director of the Institute for Middle East Peace and Development and author of a new book, Beyond America's Grasp: A Century of Failed Diplomacy in the Middle East. The United States is "acting as if there is a strong state" among the Arab states, he said. "But there is no leader who can make a decision who can carry the day. [Similarly], there is no strong leader in Palestine who can make a decision."

"Essentially there is an impasse that can only be broken if the U.S. proceeds to publish a 'peace plan' or coerce the two sides into some dialogue," a former senior Israeli official told The Cable. "So now the U.S. has to craft a policy that is comprehensive in scope (i.e., incorporates the Arab League Plan and the Syrian track) but one that is balanced between Israel and the Palestinians. The big carrot [on the Obama side]: 'Let's deal together with Iran.' The big stick: 'If you're not on board, we're out to lunch for 1-2 years. Otherwise, [there are] more pressing things to do.'"......"

1 comment:

Prophetic Senior Founding Member of the FLC said...

The 'big stick' is more of twig. Arabs can afford to wait. Arab regimes cannot but they are not in a position to 'carry the day'. Any solution that does not explicitely acknowledge the right of return and make sure that it will be implemented, is a solution deemed to fail.
There may be 'more pressing needs elsewhere' for this administration, but letting the Arab Israeli conflict fester will lead to an explosion leading to an American exit from the region. The 'pundits' are well advised to bear this in mind. It took a hundred years or so to expel the Crusaders from the region. It will take much less to expel all intruders!