Thursday, May 28, 2009

WINEP: "While the US generally refrains from intervening in foreign elections, an exception should be made in Lebanon..."

مشاركتان في مهرجان التيار الوطني الحرّ في الأشرفية أمس (بلال جاويش)



WINEP's John Hannah wants Obama to visit Nayla Moawad's house in Hazmieh! in the Washington Times, here
"Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s visit to Beirut last week underscored the enormous stake America has in parliamentary elections that Lebanon will hold June 7. The country's governing majority -- moderate, pro-Western, supported by Washington -- is running neck and neck with a coalition dominated by Hezbollah, the militant Shiite group controlled by Iran, backed by Syria and considered by American intelligence to be perhaps the world's most capable terrorist organization.
The Obama administration should continue doing everything it can to avert this looming strategic setback...
Since its election in 2005, March 14th has been committed, albeit imperfectly, to limiting the malign interference of Iran and Syria while re-establishing Lebanon's sovereignty and independence. Central to this effort has been a desire to implement U.N. Security Council resolutions calling for the dismantling of Hezbollah's powerful militia.
For its part, Hezbollah, with Iranian and Syrian backing, has worked assiduously to reverse the Cedar Revolution. .... With elections just weeks away, Lebanon's fate hangs in the balance. ...
Make no mistake: Hezbollah's triumph would constitute a major U.S. defeat. ....embolden Teheran at a time when Washington hopes to negotiate an end to Iran's nuclear weapons program, its support for terrorism and its escalating efforts -- frequently using Hezbollah operatives -- to subvert pro-U.S. governments across the Arab world from Iraq to Egypt to Morocco. (What is this guy smoking?)
With the stakes so high and the elections still too close to call, the Obama administration should throw caution to the wind and do what it can to tip the balance in March 14th's favor. While the United States generally refrains from intervening in foreign elections, an exception should be made in Lebanon -- where the consequences for U.S. national security are potentially so grave and America's enemies (read Iran and Syria) already are interfering heavily to secure an outcome harmful to U.S. interests.
Moreover, the odds actually are good that a U.S. embrace of March 14th could make a positive difference at the margins. As in much of the world, President Obama is extremely popular in Lebanon. Were he to act boldly to demonstrate America's unequivocal preference for March 14th, it could be decisive in moving key constituencies off the fence and against Hezbollah. Mr. Biden's visit to Beirut was an excellent step.
More dramatically, the president could arrange a snap Oval Office meeting with March 14th's leader, Saad Hariri (the slain prime minister's son), and use it to underscore the depths of his personal commitment to the Cedar Revolution's ideals as well as his concern for the future of U.S.-Lebanese relations should the government fall to Hezbollah..."

4 comments:

mo said...

"to act boldly to demonstrate America's unequivocal preference for March 14th"


Oh please God make him stop, my sides are hurting!

Is there any single person above the age of, i dont know, four who doesn't know what Americas "unequivocal preference" would be?

G, M, Z, or B said...

wein hal ghaybeh ya Mo?

Travis, Holy Land (is a link) said...

"Today in Tehran (24th May 2009) Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad held a trilateral summit with Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The three agreed to an official statement in which they pledged, among other things, to work together to eliminate all “terrorism” (The Corporatocracy?) in the region." - http://news.antiwar.com/2009/05/24/summit-shows-iran-a-regional-power/

It is good to realize that whose who are holding much of the world hostage with the illusion of a democracy will soon lose it’s strangle hold in the coming paradigm shift, the last cycle called “ethics”.

Free societies will soon form alliances to free countries such as The US, Israel, Great Brittan and other, so called “democracies” from corporate tyranny.

However, the death of The Old World Order will be violent; many earth-suits will perish.

The following is an excerpt from a discourse on The Above Top Secret Forum in 2007;

“The Stock Markets will soon complete their controlled demolition. After an initial 'appearance' that the 'bail outs' and 'rescue packages' have steadied the ship, there will be new record lows by the end of the month.

Our Financial Institutions will later call in all loans. There will be many bankruptcies and foreclosures.

The only way John McCain will become the next US President, will be if something "happens" to Barack Obama before the election. If there even is an election. If a certain faction get their way, there will not be. Remember, behind the scenes, there is only One Party. Our Party. 'Democracy' is an illusion which is created to uphold your slavery. Whichever side 'wins'; the Family wins.

Unless any unforeseen disruptions delay it's announcement, there will be a new currency by the end of 2008 / early 2009, along with a new Union of nations. January has been spoken of in some circles, as the latest, though there are plans underway which could even bring this to fruition much earlier than initially hoped for.

San Francisco and Damascus, will be uninhabitable by the end of 2010, possibly even sooner. Again, it depends upon certain 'forces' at play, and which timelines are activated.” - Hidden_Hand a member of “The Ruling Family”?

Al Qaeda was created by the CIA; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-hYorNi0nA

Crapola? We’ll soon know.

It appears that the truth is often more difficult to reckon than the many illusions fed to us by their corporately owned religions and other media outlets.

I will not be returning to this post. Therefore, if you have comment regarding mine, please use the Contact Us on my website; http://www.focusonrecovery.net

Thank you,

Travis

Tim said...

Yes, "intervening" in an Arab country's elections is bound to work out exactly as we'd hope.
Geez, you'd think even the most zealous of neocons would have realized by now that this sort of thing doesn't exactly endear the US to the rest of the world.