Monday, October 11, 2010

"The problem that we see and that others see here, is whether the Sadrist movement is a political movement or it is an armed militia .."

"...The administration has sought and received assurances that Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki will not offer the followers of the Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr positions in charge of Iraq’s security forces in exchange for supporting Mr. Maliki’s bid for a second term in office, according to officials familiar with negotiations now under way.
Mr. Sadr’s followers for years fought American and Iraqi troops in Baghdad and elsewhere, and while they have embraced the political process, they remain hostile to an enduring American role in Iraq.
The Sadrists’ surprising support of Mr. Maliki, only weeks after opposing his nomination, raised alarms in Washington and gave new urgency to the efforts to persuade Mr. Maliki to include the country’s other main factions in a new government.
“The problem that we see and that others see here — and I want to underline others see here — is that there is not clarity on whether the Sadrist movement is a political movement or it is an armed militia which carries out political objectives through violent means,” Ambassador James F. Jeffrey told reporters in Baghdad last week. “And a democracy can’t tolerate that.”...
The administration has worked feverishly — on the telephone from Washington and in person in Baghdad — to break the deadlock even as the focus here has shifted to the war in Afghanistan, especially in Congress. It is now fighting a perception of drift in American policy in Iraq.
In Washington, administration officials also are resisting efforts by Congress to cut $1.5 billion from the State Department’s budget for operations in Iraq.
“I worry that having invested hundreds of billions of dollars and thousands of lives in Iraq — that now that we’re at the end game — we’ll stint on the resources that are needed to bring this to the kind of conclusion that we all want,” Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates recently told an audience of R.O.T.C. students at Duke University. ..."

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Was an article a while back about how Sadr and the Mahdi Army is copying the Hezbollah model.

Muqtada has been working hard for two years to transform the Mahdi Army into another Hezbollah, personally inspired by Hassan Nasrallah. That is why he froze all activities of the Mahdi Army, so he can take a long hard look at membership and filter out the undisciplined, the reckless and the corrupt (of which there were plenty in 2003-2007).

That is why he went back to the seminary, so he could elevate his academic credentials and rise from the rank of sayyed to that of an ayatollah (which enables him to issue fatwas) and grants him greater authority within the Shi'ite community at large. And that explains why, against all odds, he has insisted on refraining from any sectarian rhetoric, copying the Nasrallah model in Lebanon, who always speaks of Lebanon, not of Shi'ites.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LD30Ak02.html

Gonzolegend