MEPGS: excerpts:President Obama's unusual, if not unprecedented backgroundpress briefing last week on US policy towards Iran surprised evenveteran Administration officials. "It shows not only theimportance the President places on reining in Iran's nuclearprogram but the success he feels he has achieved so far inreaching that goal," said one State Department official. SeniorUS officials make no secret of their pride in theAdministration's accomplishments. "Look at what we have beenable to do since taking office," said one senior US official."When we came into office, Iran was on a roll; highly confidentthat international pressure could be easily withstood. Now,unable to demonize the US led by this President, they have onesuffered one after another setbacks." ......." VeteranState Department officials acknowledge, as one put it this week,"The US is in a better place [with Iran]" due to a number ofObama Administration initiatives, including the "reset" inrelations with Russia. But this official, reflecting the viewsof a number of his colleagues, insists that while there may becracks in the Iranian system, it is far from broken. Even JointChiefs of Staff Michael Mullen's statement that the US hasmilitary plans in case of conflict with Iran was greeted with ayawn at the State Department. Said one senior official, "Theonly way to take the military option off the table is to disarm."While there is no indication that the Administration isseriously considering a military option at this stage, top USofficials are convinced that should the current strategy notalter Iran's drive to achieve a nuclear weapon, Israel will actmilitarily. And while these officials are not above using thethreat of unilateral Israeli action as an incentive to gaininternational support for its diplomatic offensive against Iran,they also say it is not their fear of Israeli action alone thatmotivates them. "If we don't succeed, our friends throughout theregion will be endangered," says one key US official. "SaudiArabia, no less than Israel will be affected.As a result, the President, according to well-placedsources, has made Iran his number one security objective. "Inevery conversation with his Russian and Chinese counterparts, thePresident has made discussion about Iran the centerpiece," saysone top Administration official. Still, some US analysts argue toadopt a more "realistic" approach to what they believe is theinevitability of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, especially sinceit appears that Teheran has already attained "nuclearcapability."...... Even hard liners within the Administration admit thatdiverting Iran from its present course by means of threats andeconomic sanctions has its limitations. .... Most important, however, is the willingness, in some caseeagerness of US and European officials to again engage in adialogue with Iran. According to informed sources, Iran has madea number of outreaches to the US and others previously engaged intalks and now it is considered a distinct possibility that somekind of talks with US, Russian, Chinese, French, British andGerman officials [Known as the "P-5+1] about Iran's nuclearprogram could well take place as early as next month.While some US and European officials are in no hurry toresume a dialogue with Iran, these same officials are more thaneager to see talks begin as soon as possible between Israel andthe Palestinian Authority. With Israel's ten month partialsettlement freeze about to run out, a steady stream of US andEuropean officials have been making their views known toPalestinian leader Abu Mazen. And even those most sympathetic tohis political weakness, have made no secret of their frustrationwith their inability to get him to agree to direct talks. "He isa good man," says one veteran US official who has known Abu Mazenfor many years. "But he is feckless."What is particularly frustrating to a number of officials isthat, with qualified Arab backing for direct talks and Israeliembrace of them, Abu Mazen has put himself in the position ofspoiler. "Abu Mazen really wants a peace deal. We're not sosure about Bibi [Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu], says oneveteran US official. Other, more senior US officials say thatPresident Obama is convinced that Netanyahu is serious aboutmaking an acceptable deal. They say that in recognition of thisfact, the Administration adjusted its approach to dealing withthe Israeli Prime Minister. "The President understood that theIsraelis needed to feel comfortable," said one well-placed USofficial. He also added "The old way wasn't working."White House support for Israel in the recent flare-up at theLebanese border was added evidence of this new sensitivity.Unlike State Department officials who emphasized that the Israelimilitary did not give sufficient warning of its planned "brushclearing" activities near the border, senior White Houseofficials blamed the Lebanese Army for not obeying "rules ofengagement" and UNIFIL, the United Nation's peacekeepers insouthern Lebanon for not living up to their mission.
"'America is something that can be easily moved. Moved to the right direction.They won’t get in our way'" Benjamin Netanyahu
Thursday, August 12, 2010
STATE Official: "Abbas is a good man ...but he is feckless..."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Who are they trying to kid. I've not seen anything so delusional since watching Downfall!
"President Obama is convinced that Netanyahu is serious about
making an acceptable deal."
President Obama must not have watched the video of Natanyahu bragging about sabotaging the Oslo peace process.
Post a Comment