Thursday, April 22, 2010

"Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is already listening to the leaders of Iran & Hezbollah,... He needs to listen to us, too.”

Bloomberg/ here
"... “This is not some kind of reward for the Syrians and the actions that they take which are deeply disturbing,” Clinton said.
Feltman also defended the decision, saying the Obama administration believes diplomacy can change Syria’s behavior. “An ambassador is not a reward; it’s a tool,” he said.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is already listening to the leaders of Iran and Hezbollah, Feltman said, and he “needs to listen ...
Syria’s government “says it wants to live in peace in the region,” Feltman testified. A senior U.S. envoy in Damascus would in time have a chance to persuade Syria that “it’s in Syria’s interest” to seek peace with Israel, respect the sovereignty of neighboring Lebanon and uphold human rights of its people, he said.
Feltman declined to answer in open session whether the U.S. has evidence to confirm Israeli claims that Syria has been smuggling long-range missiles to Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Israeli President Shimon Peres on April 13 accused the Arab country of supplying the militant group with Scuds, ground-to- ground missiles with a range of hundreds of miles.
“If these reports turn out to be true, we have to review” the full range of efforts .., while a change isn’t possible overnight, the administration can send a strong message through diplomatic channels......
“It’s important to make the case to Syria why the path they’re on is so dangerous,” Feltman said. “Syria is not Iran,” he said, noting that Syria is a secular state and that the Obama administration doesn’t see the Syria-Iran alliance as immutable.
Citing “growing rapprochement” between Syria and Saudi Arabia, Feltman said, “the Syrians try to hedge their bets.” It’s in the interests of U.S. allies, including Israel, Iraq and Lebanon, that the U.S. improves relations with Syria in an effort to change its behavior.

1 comment:

Skeptical Senior Founding Member of the FLC said...

Why does Syria have to listen to the US? The last time a 'conversation' took place was when Colin Powell made a list of humiliating demands with no discussion. Why should the Arabs listen to the US when the latter has systematically been siding with the existential enemy of the Arabs? How credible, believable, and truthful are US promises? It is up to the US to show goodwill in actions and not in empty promises before someone is willing to 'listen'!