".... I am a card-carrying realist on the grounds that ousting regimes and replacing them with something better is easier said than done. I also believe that Washington, in most cases, doesn't have the luxury of trying. The United States must, for example, work with undemocratic China to rein in North Korea and with autocratic Russia to reduce each side's nuclear arsenal. This debate is anything but academic. It's at the core of what is likely to be the most compelling international story of 2010: Iran.In the wake of 9/11, the Bush administration judged incorrectly that Iran was on the verge of revolution and decided that dealing directly with Tehran would provide a lifeline to an evil government soon to be swept away by history's tide. A valuable opportunity to limit Iran's nuclear program may have been lost as a result. The incoming Obama administration reversed this approach and expressed a willingness to talk to Iran without preconditions. This president (like George H.W. Bush, whose emissaries met with Chinese leaders soon after Tiananmen Square) is cut more from the realist cloth. Diplomacy and negotiations are seen not as favors to bestow but as tools to employ. The other options—using military force against Iranian nuclear facilities or living with an Iranian nuclear bomb—were judged to be tremendously unattractive. And if diplomacy failed, Obama reasoned, it would be easier to build domestic and international support for more robust sanctions. At the time, I agreed with him.I've changed my mind.The nuclear talks are going nowhere. The Iranians appear intent on developing the means to produce a nuclear weapon; there is no other explanation for the secret uranium-enrichment facility discovered near the holy city of Qum. Fortunately,their nuclear program appears to have hit some technical snags, which puts off the need to decide whether to launch a preventive strike. Instead we should be focusing on another fact: Iran may be closer to profound political change than at any time since the revolution that ousted the shah 30 years ago.The authorities overreached in their blatant manipulation of last June's presidential election, ......Ali Khamenei has lost much of his legitimacy, .....The opposition Green Movement has grown larger and stronger.....The United States, European governments, and others should shift their Iran policy toward increasing the prospects for political change. Leaders should speak out for the Iranian people and their rights. President Obama did this on Dec. 28 after several protesters were killed on the Shia holy day of Ashura, and he should do so again. So should congressional and world leaders. Iran's Revolutionary Guards should be singled out for sanctions. Lists of their extensive financial holdings can be published on the Internet. The United States should press the European Union and others not to trade or provide financing to selected entities controlled by the Guards. ....It is essential to bolster what people in Iran know.......Just as important as what to do is what to avoid. Congressmen and senior administration figures should avoid meeting with the regime......Critics will say promoting regime change will encourage Iranian authorities to tar the opposition as pawns of the West. But the regime is already doing so. Outsiders should act to strengthen the opposition and to deepen rifts among the rulers. This process is underway, and while it will take time, it promises the first good chance in decades to bring about an Iran that, even if less than a model country, would nonetheless act considerably better at home and abroad. Even a realist should recognize that it's an opportunity not to be missed."
"'America is something that can be easily moved. Moved to the right direction.They won’t get in our way'" Benjamin Netanyahu
Monday, January 25, 2010
"Enough is enough" [Regime Change ...quick!]
Richard Haass in Newsweek/ here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
To whom do these people that make or advise on foreign policy listen. In the case of Iran, is Israel the source of info, or is Iranian exiles cut from the cloth of Chalabi. It is sad to see serious people indulge in wishful thinking rather into sober analysis. They may wish the regime in Iran to change but the fact of the matter is that this will not happen, at least soon. So deal with it and come up with something more palatable. One also wonders why no 'questioning' of Israel's nuclear arsenal is ever made. Israel never signed the NPT and nobody seems to be bothered by that. Put the pressure on Israel to come clean on that matter and things could change dramatically in the region. What if Mubarak dies and little Jamal is not in power? What if a major political shift takes place in Egypt to be more in tune with Syria, Turkey, or Iran. What will happen to the US foreign policy then built on wishful thinking and a profound belief that by wishing something very hard, you will get it in the end.
Post a Comment