"Suspicions by Pakistan's powerful army that the country's civilian leadership is growing too close to the United States are fueling a political crisis that analysts here believe threatens the survival of the government and could divert attention from the battle against Islamic extremists.
Military officials believe that secretly taped conversations between Pakistani President Asif Zardari and his ambassador in Washington, prove that it was at Zardari's insistence that a $1.5 billion U.S. aid package passed by Congress in September contained several provisions that angered the Pakistani military. The military publicly protested the aid package last month.
"The reaction (from the military) was not so much to what was in the bill but to the thought that the government was trying to create a civilian-to-civilian dialogue (with Washington)," said a senior Pakistani official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The army has ruled Pakistan for most its existence, with civilian rule returning only last year.
Now the military is responding by pressing a confrontation with Zardari over the expiration of a legal amnesty for politicians that benefited many members of Zardari's government, including the president himself and his ambassador to Washington, Husain Haqqani...... That will expose serving ministers and senior aides to prosecution over cases that range from corruption to murder — including Zardari, who was charged with taking kickbacks when his wife, the assassinated Benazir Bhutto, served as the country's prime minister.
Most here argue that Zardari, who is head of the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party, will still have legal immunity as president. But analysts believe the military is behind a campaign to oust Zardari and, with the help of sympathetic media and opposition politicians, is using the end of the amnesty as an opportunity to strike. While dislodging the president will be tough, it is possible that he'll be forced to transfer most of his powers to the prime minister through a constitutional amendment.......
A military spy agency recorded Zardari and Haqqani discussing the legislation. Knowledgeable civilian and military officials, who spoke only if they were not identified by name, said the recordings captured the two discussing how to strengthen democratic institutions in Pakistan.
Even when there have been civilian governments in Islamabad, the military has viewed sensitive foreign and security policies as its purview. In particular, the military jealously guards its role in relations with India, Afghanistan and the United States, as well as the policy toward the country's nuclear arsenal. Zardari, however, has intruded in all those areas since taking office. Zardari also unsuccessfully tried to place the main military spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, (ISI) under civilian control, and he offered a "no first use" policy on Pakistan's nuclear weapons to India...."
"'America is something that can be easily moved. Moved to the right direction.They won’t get in our way'" Benjamin Netanyahu
Friday, December 4, 2009
Secretly taped conversations between Zardari & his ambassador in Washington, prove that they conspired against Military...
McClatchy's/ here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Much of the criticism is being made on Kerry Lugar bill so far. The Kerry Lugar Bill is the first US aid bill for Pakistan that does not contain any threat of sanctions against Pakistan. Zardari is elected president of Pakistan and what he is doing is for Pakistan. Can anyone point out any policy or decision of Zardari that goes against Pakistan?.
The story published here is once again an attempt to create rift between military top brass and Govt. Zardari took all the top brass of military into confidence on Kerry Lugar bill. Zardari is a patriot and not against Pakistan, he can never be against the military.
Further I don’t think there is anything wrong in Kerry Lugar bill. Though it is non military aid , but limitations on military equipment can still be waived if Secretary of state’s under the direction of President states that provision of such equipment is in the interest of US national security(SEC 203 e).It is similar to Presseler amendment during Reagan administration and Congressional approval during Bush administration.
The conditions attached under Kerry Lugar bill are similar, to what have been imposed during Zia and Musharraf regimes, they are little more elaborative this time. They are safe harbors in order to ensure, democratic, peaceful and economically developed Pakistan.
I am sure the purpose to publish this self made story is to indirectly invite military intervention. It is good attempt to derail the democratic process by involving military. Such posts clearly represent anti-democratic forces agenda.
Post a Comment