Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Richard Perle: "Iraq was not a neocon masterplan"

...In a nutshell, Perle is also saying that the Nouveaux-cons did not influence W's Administration ... in the National Interest, here
"...As a result, the foreign and security policies declared by the president in speeches, in public and private meetings, in backgrounders and memoranda often had little or no effect on the activities of the sprawling bureaucracies charged with carrying out the president’s policies. They didn’t need his directives: they had their own....
Guileless to a fault, George W. Bush has been among the most straightforward American presidents in my lifetime.....
So if it was not a neocon master plan, how did we end up invading Iraq? What were the considerations that led Bush to bring down Saddam Hussein’s regime by force? What was the role of neoconservatives in his decision to go to war in Iraq? Many people believe they know the answer to these questions because so much has been written, with seeming authority, by so many commentators. Could 50 million blogs be wrong?
I BELIEVE that Bush went to war for the reasons—and only the reasons—he gave at the time: because he believed Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the United States that was far greater than the likely cost of removing him from power...."

No comments: